| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ronan Dunklau <rdunklau(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Extensions makefiles - coverage |
| Date: | 2013-09-22 05:34:53 |
| Message-ID: | 1379828093.5400.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:07 +0200, Ronan Dunklau wrote:
> I am using approximatively the layout that was proposed here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51BB1B6E.2070705@dunslane.net
> It looks like everything is hard-coded to take the source and the
> gcda, gcno files in the base directory, but these files lay in a src
> directory with the proposed layout.
The PostgreSQL build system isn't going to work very well if you build
files outside of the current directory. If you want to put your source
files into a src/ subdirectory, then your top-level makefile should to a
$(MAKE) -C src, and you need to have a second makefile in the src
directory. If you do that, then the existing coverage targets will work
alright, I think.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-09-22 06:33:39 | Re: [v9.4] row level security |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-09-22 04:33:31 | Re: [PATCH] Add use of asprintf() |