Re: git apply vs patch -p1

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: git apply vs patch -p1
Date: 2013-09-15 05:01:18
Message-ID: 1379221278.10763.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 11:37 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Lately I've been running into a lot of reports of false conflicts
> reported by "git apply". The most recent one was the "points" patch,
> which git apply rejected for completely ficticious reasons (it claimed
> that the patch was trying to create a new file where a file already
> existed, which it wasn't)

Every file in that patch contains

new file mode 100644

which means it is creating a new file. I would review how that patch
was created.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin 2013-09-15 05:13:22 Questions about checksum feature in 9.3
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-09-15 04:55:45 Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL