Re: record identical operator

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: record identical operator
Date: 2013-09-13 22:13:20
Message-ID: 1379110400.48994.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> I am not actually that concerned with MVCs using this, you're quite
> capable of analyzing the dangers. What I am wary of is exposing an
> operator that's basically broken from the get go to SQL.
> Now, the obvious issue there is that matviews use SQL to refresh :(

I'm not sure why these operators are more broken or dangerous than
those which already exist to support the text_pattern_ops and
bpchar_pattern_ops operator families.  I could overload those
operator names as much as possible if that seems better.  As I said
at the start of the thread, I have no particular attachment to
these operator names.  For example, that would mean using ~>=~ as
the operator for record_image_ge() instead of using >==.  It would
be trivial to make that adjustment to the patch.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-09-13 22:20:11 Re: record identical operator
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-09-13 22:01:56 Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE