Re: ECPG FETCH readahead

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
Date: 2013-09-07 01:25:02
Message-ID: 1378517102.7389.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 10:06 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 2013-08-17 12:08 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
> >
> > I have put the broken up patchset into a GIT tree of mine at GitHub:
> > https://github.com/zboszor/ecpg-readahead/
> > but the huge compressed patch is also attached for reference.
>
> I merged current PG GIT HEAD in the above tree and fixed a merge conflict
> caused by commit 673b527534893a4a8adb3cdef52fc645c13598ce
>
> The huge patch is attached for reference.

The documentation doesn't build:

openjade:ecpg.sgml:478:8:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified
openjade:ecpg.sgml:477:40: start tag was here
openjade:ecpg.sgml:478:8:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified
openjade:ecpg.sgml:477:20: start tag was here
openjade:ecpg.sgml:478:8:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified
openjade:ecpg.sgml:473:81: start tag was here
openjade:ecpg.sgml:478:8:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified
openjade:ecpg.sgml:473:56: start tag was here

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-09-07 01:57:22 Re: strange IS NULL behaviour
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-09-07 01:23:31 Re: [v9.4] row level security