| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs |
| Date: | 2013-08-28 04:09:05 |
| Message-ID: | 1377662945.14126.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 09:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > When adding regression tests, can you please add intentional
> > syntax error cases to exercise all the new ereport()s?
>
> Please do not add test cases merely to prove that. Yeah, you should
> probably have exercised each error case in devel testing, but that does
> not mean that every future run of the regression tests needs to do it too.
I disagree. The next person who wants to hack on this feature should be
given the confidence that he's not breaking behavior that the last guy
put in.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-08-28 04:11:07 | Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2013-08-28 03:46:23 | Re: Valgrind Memcheck support |