| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Back-patch change in hashed DISTINCT estimation? |
| Date: | 2013-08-21 14:44:07 |
| Message-ID: | 1377096247.99524.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Yeah, I've been thinking about this a bit also and agree that 9.3
> is fine but not farther back.
+1 to 9.3 but no farther back.
I would be in favor of going farther back if there were not fairly
obvious workarounds for the OOM problems that lack of back-patch
could cause.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-08-21 14:52:01 | Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) |
| Previous Message | MauMau | 2013-08-21 14:30:30 | [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions |