Re: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified
Date: 2005-01-10 16:39:53
Message-ID: 13766.1105375193@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Comments?

> Only: Josh, put a hold on those press releases, looks like an RC5 is
> forthcoming ...

I knew you were going to say that ;-)

I'm not sure if we should insist on an RC5 for this or not. If we'd
found it after release we'd have stuck it into 8.0.1 without any special
extra testing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-01-10 17:17:12 Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-01-10 16:37:30 Re: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified