| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: timeline signedness |
| Date: | 2013-08-15 03:34:35 |
| Message-ID: | 1376537675.11756.6.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 16:20 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 13.08.2013 14:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 21:55 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> WAL timelines are unsigned 32-bit integers everywhere, except the
> >> replication parser (replication/repl_gram.y and
> >> replication/repl_scanner.l) treats them as signed 32-bit integers. It's
> >> obviously a corner case, but it would be prudent to be correct about
> >> this. It should be easy to fix in those grammar files.
>
> +1
>
> > Here is a patch to fix this.
>
> If I'm reading this correctly, timeline 0 no longer throws an error with
> this patch.
Fixed that.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-08-15 03:35:45 | Re: updatable/deletable terminology |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2013-08-15 02:17:15 | Re: Incorrect information in src/backend/optimizer/README |