Re: timeline signedness

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: timeline signedness
Date: 2013-08-13 11:31:53
Message-ID: 1376393513.23146.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 21:55 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> WAL timelines are unsigned 32-bit integers everywhere, except the
> replication parser (replication/repl_gram.y and
> replication/repl_scanner.l) treats them as signed 32-bit integers. It's
> obviously a corner case, but it would be prudent to be correct about
> this. It should be easy to fix in those grammar files.

Here is a patch to fix this.

Attachment Content-Type Size
timeline-unsigned.patch text/x-patch 2.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2013-08-13 13:25:03 Re: How to create read-only view on 9.3
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-08-13 11:30:35 Re: Regarding BGworkers