| From: | philj80(at)netscape(dot)net (Philip) |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Does Postgresql 7.1.x Still Have 8K Maximum Field Size? |
| Date: | 2001-09-15 10:57:58 |
| Message-ID: | 137490ED.111A0CD3.0020EA2F@netscape.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello all.
I will be creating one of my first web applications and would like to use Postgresql as the database on a Red Hat 6.2 or 7.1 system with Apache and either ColdFusion or PHP.
Anyway, the application will have a text field where employees can update their progress on assigned tasks. By the time a task is completed, the field may exceed 8k. I am not a person who likes to compile from tarball's because training non-Linux experienced fellow system administrators to use RPMs is enough. Updates are easier as well.
The question: Is it possible to have a text field greater than 8k but only using RPMs -- not compiling and/or chaining via a separate table (breaking something into 8k chunks)? If so, how?
Any assistance you can provide is appreciated. Thanks.
__________________________________________________________________
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop(at)Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | speedboy | 2001-09-15 11:15:38 | Re: Does Postgresql 7.1.x Still Have 8K Maximum Field |
| Previous Message | Hans-Juergen Schoenig | 2001-09-15 08:30:02 | strange core dump ... |