| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Sam's Lists" <samslists(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, lance_rushing(at)hotmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: What happened with bug #2527? |
| Date: | 2009-08-15 15:32:26 |
| Message-ID: | 13741.1250350346@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"Sam's Lists" <samslists(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I seem to be being bitten by the same bug as #2527 which was reported three
> years ago.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-07/msg00056.php
> I can't find any record of it having been addressed.
I don't think it's really a bug --- or at least, if it's a bug, the bug
is that it doesn't throw error on both of those inputs. See the lexeme
quoting rules at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/datatype-textsearch.html
which these examples are clearly violating.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | durfenlee | 2009-08-15 17:33:01 | BUG #4987: registered in pg_type by a wrong table name |
| Previous Message | Sam's Lists | 2009-08-15 05:13:34 | What happened with bug #2527? |