Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)
Date: 2013-06-30 18:11:58
Message-ID: 1372615918.19747.22.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 11:38 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Since Greg seems to be busy, what needs to be done to test this?

As I understand it, he was mainly asking if posix_fallocate works at
all. I tried to address that question with a simple test, which behaves
as I expected it to:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1372615313.19747.13.camel@jdavis

Unless something surprising comes up, or someone thinks and objection
has been missed, I am going to commit this soon.

(Of course, to avoid your wrath, I'll get rid of the GUC which was added
for testing.)

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2013-06-30 18:54:40 Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2013-06-30 18:01:53 Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)