Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items
Date: 2015-05-14 22:57:24
Message-ID: 13721.1431644244@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
>> I will call for a vote that the freeze deadline be changed if this patch
>> is rejected to due to time. I might lose the vote, but I am going to
>> try because if we lose our reputation for fairness, we have lost a lot
>> more than a week/month of release time.

> I'm guessing the vote is core-only, but +1 from me in any case. I fully
> agree that this patch has had a serious measure of effort put behind it
> from the author and is absolutely a capability we desire and need to
> have in core.

I should think we'd have learned by now what happens when we delay a
release date to get in some extra feature. It hasn't worked well in
the past and I see no reason to believe the results would be any more
desirable this time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-05-14 22:58:39 Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-05-14 22:48:24 Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items