| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: refresh materialized view concurrently |
| Date: | 2013-06-17 15:21:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1371482473.75331.YahooMailNeo@web162904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2013/6/17 Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>:
>
>> + errmsg("concurrent refresh requires a
>> unique index on just columns for all rows of the materialized view")));
>
> Maybe my english is failing me here, but I don’t understand the “just” part.
It means that the index must not use any expressions in the list of
what it's indexing on -- only column names. Suggestions for better
wording would be welcome.
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-06-17 15:31:22 | Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls |
| Previous Message | Stefan Drees | 2013-06-17 15:18:59 | Re: matview incremental maintenance |