Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
Date: 2018-01-08 19:39:24
Message-ID: 13711.1515440364@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> As I already mentioned, Tom's updated patch is better than what I posted
> initially, and I agree with his approach to the remaining issues he
> pointed out. But I somehow assumed that he's already looking into that.
> Tom, do you plan to look into this patch soon, or should I?

No, I thought you were going to run with those ideas. I have a lot of
other stuff on my plate ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Pedersen 2018-01-08 19:50:02 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-08 19:24:42 Re: PL/Python SD dict wiped?