| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mathias Hasselmann <mathias(at)openismus(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Murray Cumming <murrayc(at)openismus(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Avahi support for Postgresql |
| Date: | 2008-02-25 19:25:21 |
| Message-ID: | 1371.1203967521@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Mathias Hasselmann <mathias(at)openismus(dot)com> writes:
> Oh, that difference is really interesting. I didn't even see it.
> DNS-SD uses the convention "_<protoname>._<type>" to describe services,
> and that's the convention Avahi follows. I don't know why the Bonjour
> API uses that trailing dot, but it seems wrong:
Is removing that dot going to create compatibility problems for us?
If it means that an 8.3 client wouldn't find an 8.4 server, for
instance, I don't think that's going to be acceptable. Do we need
to "listen" on both names (whatever the heck that means in zeroconf)?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mathias Hasselmann | 2008-02-25 19:26:22 | Re: Avahi support for Postgresql |
| Previous Message | Mathias Hasselmann | 2008-02-25 19:24:08 | Re: Avahi support for Postgresql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mathias Hasselmann | 2008-02-25 19:26:22 | Re: Avahi support for Postgresql |
| Previous Message | Mathias Hasselmann | 2008-02-25 19:24:08 | Re: Avahi support for Postgresql |