From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hari Babu <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com>, 'PostgreSQL-development' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: system catalog pg_rewrite column ev_attr document description problem |
Date: | 2013-06-08 18:35:34 |
Message-ID: | 1370716534.4410.YahooMailNeo@web162901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> writes:
>>> If we were a little earlier in the release cycle I would argue that
>>> if we're going to do anything with this column we should drop it.
>
>> Which is exactly what I think we should do as soon as we branch.
>
> If we're going to do that, there doesn't seem to me to be a lot of point
> in adjusting the column's contents in 9.3 --- the argument for doing
> that was mostly forward compatibility with some future actual usage of
> the column. I'd be more inclined to leave HEAD as-is and then do the
> column-ectomy along with this removal of dead code in 9.4.
ok
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2013-06-08 18:38:28 | Re: Bad error message on valuntil |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-06-08 18:33:26 | Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks) |