Re: system catalog pg_rewrite column ev_attr document description problem

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hari Babu <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com>, 'PostgreSQL-development' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: system catalog pg_rewrite column ev_attr document description problem
Date: 2013-06-08 18:35:34
Message-ID: 1370716534.4410.YahooMailNeo@web162901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> writes:

>>> If we were a little earlier in the release cycle I would argue that
>>> if we're going to do anything with this column we should drop it.
>
>> Which is exactly what I think we should do as soon as we branch.
>
> If we're going to do that, there doesn't seem to me to be a lot of point
> in adjusting the column's contents in 9.3 --- the argument for doing
> that was mostly forward compatibility with some future actual usage of
> the column.  I'd be more inclined to leave HEAD as-is and then do the
> column-ectomy along with this removal of dead code in 9.4.

ok

--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2013-06-08 18:38:28 Re: Bad error message on valuntil
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-06-08 18:33:26 Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks)