From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CommitFest dragging? |
Date: | 2008-07-20 19:05:27 |
Message-ID: | 13706.1216580727@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 10:17 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> It's been 3 weeks since the start of the commitfest, and less than half
>> the patches have been committed or sent back. We seem to be stalled.
> Let's not forget that it is the middle of summer. As I recall that was
> the whole reason to try and push 8.2 to a late spring release :P (which
> failed of course) but my point is, people are low on cycles.
Sure, but the folks who volunteered to be reviewers for this fest
presumably expected to have cycles to do that. I agree with Josh B
that there's too many patches for which nothing has happened for longer
than is reasonable.
I don't have a problem with pushing a patch to the next fest if the
author is the one who's not answering, but it'd be less than fair to do
so when it's the reviewer who's dropped the ball.
(At the same time, it should be noted that some of the patches seem to
be getting review activity that's not reflected on the wiki page.
A lot of people seem to have poked at the WITH RECURSIVE patch in
particular.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2008-07-20 21:43:35 | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-20 18:50:50 | Re: pg_dump lock timeout |