From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | dx k9 <bitsandbytes88(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | posgres support <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.1 RPM - seucrity update to 9.1.9 still shows 9.1-4? |
Date: | 2013-06-05 20:16:11 |
Message-ID: | 1370463371.18839.2.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 16:04 -0400, dx k9 wrote:
> There is no difference in the rpm here for 9.1 as we used originally last year.
> http://yum.postgresql.org/repopackages.php
>
> This
> makes me think the vulnerability didn't exist with the RPM version of
> 9.1. Otherwise, postres wouldn't have the same exact rpm still available
> for download. It uses 9.1-4 just like I downloaded July 31 2012 with the same exact byte count.
repo packages != PostgreSQL RPMs
You first install the repository RPMs. The repo RPMs just prepare your
system so that you can install PostgreSQL. -4 is the version of the
repository RPM -- not PostgreSQL rpm.
Then, yum install postgresql91-server will install 9.1 on your system
--whatever the version is.
So for example, the latest in 9.1 for RHEL 6 is:
http://yum.postgresql.org/9.1/redhat/rhel-6-x86_64/repoview/postgresql91-server.html
9.1.9 .
-HTH
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | apagador | 2013-06-06 08:37:28 | Hide users not created by a user |
Previous Message | dx k9 | 2013-06-05 20:04:30 | 9.1 RPM - seucrity update to 9.1.9 still shows 9.1-4? |