Re: default namespace (schema) confusion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Carl Anderson <candrsn(at)mindspring(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: default namespace (schema) confusion
Date: 2002-10-18 02:20:01
Message-ID: 13704.1034907601@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Carl Anderson <candrsn(at)mindspring(dot)com> writes:
> this use of "@" in the default schema is a bit counter intuitive
> so I offer the following patch against CVS

Hmm, this seems like a wart, but then the db_user_namespace feature
is an acknowledged wart already.

I think I'd be willing to hold still for this if it happens only when
db_user_namespace is on. Comments anyone?

> + uname_local = (char *)
> malloc(strlen(uname)); + strcpy
> (uname_local,uname);

Use pstrdup, please.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-18 02:26:35 Re: default namespace (schema) confusion
Previous Message Carl Anderson 2002-10-18 01:42:38 default namespace (schema) confusion