| From: | David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unsigned integer types |
| Date: | 2013-05-28 22:59:52 |
| Message-ID: | 1369781992849-5757234.post@n5.nabble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Maciej Gajewski wrote
> I'm also afraid that with
> the extension I'd be left on my own maintaining it forever. While if
> this could go into the core product, it would live forever.
Clarification from the gallery: are we talking an extension or a custom
PostgreSQL build/fork?
If it is an extension the stick it up on GitHub and let whomever finds it
valuable help contribute to keeping it relevant.
No use letting perfection stand in the way of usability. If the current
solutions are too slow then exploring the extension aspect - even if it
falls short - is worthwhile. At minimum you learn from the experience and
maybe someone else (or even yourself) can build on that foundation.
David J.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Unsigned-integer-types-tp5756994p5757234.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-05-28 23:00:29 | Re: Unsigned integer types |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2013-05-28 22:57:41 | Re: Unsigned integer types |