From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command in PL block hitting Assert |
Date: | 2013-04-23 21:34:29 |
Message-ID: | 1366752869.62658.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 2013-04-22 18:35:04 +0530, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
>>> I have observed that following sequence is causing server crash.
>>>
>>> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW temp_class_mv AS
>>> SELECT * FROM pg_class
>>> WITH NO DATA;
>>>
>>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_refresh_mv()
>>> RETURNS int
>>> AS $$
>>> BEGIN
>>> REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW temp_class_mv;
>>> return 1;
>>> END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
>>>
>>> SELECT test_refresh_mv();
>>>
>>>
>>> I had a quick look over the crash and it is hitting following Assert in
>>> spi.c:
>>>
>>> else if (IsA(stmt, RefreshMatViewStmt))
>>> {
>>> Assert(strncmp(completionTag,
>>> "REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ", 23) == 0);
>>> _SPI_current->processed = strtoul(completionTag + 23,
>>> NULL, 10);
>>> }
>>>
>>> It seems like we are missing expected value for completionTag in
>>> ExecRefreshMatView()
>> Possibly independent from this issue, but where did that 23 come from?
When the consensus developed to change the syntax from LOAD
MATERIALIZED VIEW I failed to noticed the length here when making
the changes for that.
> BTW, attached is the patch which works well for me, but need details review.
I suggest that we just rip out this section of code. Trying to
provide a number here is probably all wrong, anyway. As the
features evolve, there may not be a readily accessible rowcount for
this command in all cases.
Any objections to the attached to fix this issue?
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
mv_crash-v2.patch | text/x-patch | 670 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-04-23 21:56:34 | Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2013-04-23 21:25:47 | Re: GSOC Student Project Idea |