Re: External Large objects what became of them

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Willis, Ian (Ento, Canberra)" <Ian(dot)Willis(at)ento(dot)csiro(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: External Large objects what became of them
Date: 2000-11-20 22:46:03
Message-ID: 13665.974760363@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Willis, Ian (Ento, Canberra)" <Ian(dot)Willis(at)ento(dot)csiro(dot)au> writes:
> By external large objects I mean storing the objects as ordinary files
> through the database interface, giving you a filesystem that supports
> tranactions though a postgresql interface.

Huh? LOs stored as ordinary files would by definition *NOT* have
transactional semantics --- aborted changes wouldn't roll back, and
there'd be no way to prevent people from seeing intermediate states
of a transaction, either.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-20 23:00:48 Re: External Large objects what became of them
Previous Message Willis, Ian (Ento, Canberra) 2000-11-20 22:24:37 RE: External Large objects what became of them