From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Kincaid <tomjohnkincaid(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce) |
Date: | 2021-08-17 17:57:43 |
Message-ID: | 1366305.1629223063@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> The only hard requirement for this feature is if we
>> use the database OID for some kind of encryption or integrity checking
>> or checksum type feature.
> It's fairly unclear to me why that is so important as to justify the
> amount of klugery that this line of thought seems to be bringing.
And, not to put too fine a point on it, how will you possibly do
that without entirely breaking CREATE DATABASE?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2021-08-17 18:06:23 | Re: archive status ".ready" files may be created too early |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-08-17 17:54:40 | Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce) |