| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, tomas(dot)vondra(at)postgresql(dot)org, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Hans Buschmann <buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Removing 32 bit support starting from PG17++ |
| Date: | 2023-05-25 01:04:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1365759.1684976652@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2023-05-24 19:51:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So dropping PA-RISC altogether should probably happen for v17, maybe even
>> v16.
> Definitely for 17 - not sure if we have much to gain by doing it in 16.
I'm just thinking that we'll have no way to test it. I wouldn't advocate
such a change in released branches; but I think it'd be within policy
still for v16, and that would give us one less year of claimed support
for an arch we can't test.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2023-05-25 01:20:30 | Re: PostgreSQL 16 Beta 1 release announcement draft |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-05-25 01:00:24 | Re: Proposal: Removing 32 bit support starting from PG17++ |