Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu
Date: 2000-02-17 06:12:14
Message-ID: 13657.950767934@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> But, I'd have no objection to a configure or initdb option; I *would*
> suggest that the old default (and it is the default mostly because
> original Postgres95 had no other styles implemented) is a relatively
> poor choice, and that ISO should be the default choice in the absence
> of an explicit configure or initdb switch.

As I said, I have no objection to making ISO the new "standard default";
I just think some people will need a way to change the default in their
installations.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-02-17 06:14:23 Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-02-17 06:04:45 Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change