From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu |
Date: | 2000-02-17 06:12:14 |
Message-ID: | 13657.950767934@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> But, I'd have no objection to a configure or initdb option; I *would*
> suggest that the old default (and it is the default mostly because
> original Postgres95 had no other styles implemented) is a relatively
> poor choice, and that ISO should be the default choice in the absence
> of an explicit configure or initdb switch.
As I said, I have no objection to making ISO the new "standard default";
I just think some people will need a way to change the default in their
installations.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-02-17 06:14:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-02-17 06:04:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change |