Re: Enabling Checksums

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums
Date: 2013-04-10 18:19:56
Message-ID: 1365617996.12032.3.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 11:01 +0300, Ants Aasma wrote:
> I think we should first deal with using it for page checksums and if
> future versions want to reuse some of the code for WAL checksums then
> we can rearrange the code.

Sounds good to me, although I expect we at least want any assembly to be
in a separate file (if the specialization makes it in 9.3).

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2013-04-10 18:39:25 Re: Inconsistent DB data in Streaming Replication
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-04-10 17:42:23 Re: Inconsistent DB data in Streaming Replication