From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: corrupt pages detected by enabling checksums |
Date: | 2013-04-05 23:29:47 |
Message-ID: | 1365204587.7580.3175.camel@sussancws0025 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 15:09 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> How does the attached version look? I verified that it survives
> recovery, but not more.
Comments:
* Regarding full page writes, we can:
- always write full pages (as in your current patch), regardless of
the current settings
- take WALInsertLock briefly to get the current settings from XLogCtl
- always calculate the full page record, but in XLogInsert, if it
happens to be a HINT record, and full page writes are not necessary,
then discard it (right now I somewhat favor this option but I haven't
looked at the details)
* typo in "Backup blocks are not used in **xlog xlog** records"
* To get the appropriate setting for buffer_std, we should pass it down
through MarkBufferDirty as an extra flag, I think.
* I'm a bit worried that we'll need a cleanup lock when restoring an FSM
page. What do you think?
* In xlog_redo, it seemed slightly awkward to call XLogRecGetData twice.
Merely a matter of preference but I thought I would mention it.
> Jeff, any chance you can run this for a round with your suite?
Yes. I don't have a rigorous test suite, but I'll do some manual tests
and walk through it with gdb.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2013-04-05 23:39:37 | Re: corrupt pages detected by enabling checksums |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2013-04-05 23:01:28 | Re: Back branches vs. gcc 4.8.0 |