| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Date: | 2013-04-05 20:25:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1365193514.43330.YahooMailNeo@web162903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> My opinion is that we don't need to be perfect as long as we
> catch 99% of random errors and we don't have any major blind
> spots.
+1
> Also, the first version doesn't necessarily need to perform well;
> we can leave optimization as future work.
+1, as long as we don't slow down instances not using the feature,
and we don't paint ourselves into a corner.
> We're not really trying to catch memory errors anyway.
+1
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-04-05 22:02:28 | Re: BUG #8043: 9.2.4 doesn't open WAL files from archive, only looks in pg_xlog |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2013-04-05 19:39:51 | Re: Enabling Checksums |