From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: To what extent should tests rely on VACUUM ANALYZE? |
Date: | 2024-03-29 18:35:42 |
Message-ID: | 136505.1711737342@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> I experimented with the attached modified version of the patch,
> which probes just after the relevant VACUUMs and reduces the
> crankiness of ConditionalLockBufferForCleanup a bit to more nearly
> approximate what we're likely to see in the buildfarm.
Sigh, forgot to attach the patch, not that you couldn't have
guessed what's in it.
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-cranky-ConditionalLockBufferForCleanup.patch | text/x-diff | 5.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | walther | 2024-03-29 18:47:54 | Re: Building with meson on NixOS/nixpkgs |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-03-29 18:31:32 | Re: To what extent should tests rely on VACUUM ANALYZE? |