From: | Rusty Conover <rconover(at)infogears(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | psql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: GIST versus GIN indexes for intarrays |
Date: | 2009-02-12 21:05:02 |
Message-ID: | 1363CC06-551F-46E7-A662-8DABB42A8910@infogears.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Feb 12, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rusty Conover <rconover(at)infogears(dot)com> writes:
>> Since 100% of my queries are for retrieval, I should use GIN but it
>> never appears to be used unlike how GIST indexes are:
>
> You haven't shown us either the table or the index declaration,
> so it's a bit tough to comment on that. It's worth noting though
> that your GIST example appears to rely on a nonstandard operator
> class.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Hi Tom,
My apologies, below is the table definition, and the GIN index creation.
The gist__int_ops is the default operator class for integer[] arrays,
as shown at:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/intarray.html
gearbuyer_ig=# \d items
Table "public.items"
Column | Type | Modifiers
-------------------------+-----------
+---------------------------------------------------
item_id | integer | not null default
nextval('generic_seq'::regclass)
gb_product_url | text | not null
group_id | integer |
category_id | integer |
product_name | text | not null
gender | text | not null
description_extract | text | not null
sort_price | real | not null
price_range | text | not null
brand_id | integer | not null
xapian_doc_id | integer |
average_rating | uint1 |
reviews_count | smallint |
store_count | uint1 |
default_image_id | integer |
available_sizes | integer[] |
fast_colors | integer[] |
has_coupons | boolean | not null default false
age_low | uint1 |
sale_percentage_low | uint1 |
store_count_low | uint1 |
price_range_low | smallint |
offering_stores | integer[] |
subclassification_ids | integer[] |
popularity_rank | integer |
default_similarity_type | uint1 |
default_similarity_id | integer |
gc_lookup_id | integer |
The GIN index was created via:
CREATE INDEX items_fast_colors_rdtree_idx ON items USING gin
(fast_colors);
Cheers,
Rusty
--
Rusty Conover
rconover(at)infogears(dot)com
InfoGears Inc / GearBuyer.com / FootwearBuyer.com
http://www.infogears.com
http://www.gearbuyer.com
http://www.footwearbuyer.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Lister | 2009-02-12 21:11:07 | Re: database corruption help |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-12 20:54:16 | Re: GIST versus GIN indexes for intarrays |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-12 21:29:38 | Re: [PERFORM] GIST versus GIN indexes for intarrays |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-12 20:54:16 | Re: GIST versus GIN indexes for intarrays |