| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Don Drake <dondrake(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: NULLS and string concatenation |
| Date: | 2004-11-19 20:01:42 |
| Message-ID: | 13631.1100894502@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Don Drake <dondrake(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This is still strange to me. In Oracle, the same query would not
> replace the *entire* string with a NULL, it treats the NULL as a no
> value.
Oracle is a bit, um, standards-challenged. They fail to make a
distinction between an empty string and a NULL, but such a distinction
is both logically necessary and required by the SQL standard.
> I can't find in the documentation where string concatenation of any
> string and NULL is NULL.
SQL92 section 6.13 <string value expression>, General Rule 2a:
a) If either S1 or S2 is the null value, then the result of the
<concatenation> is the null value.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory S. Williamson | 2004-11-19 20:03:21 | Re: NULLS and string concatenation |
| Previous Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2004-11-19 19:23:43 | Re: SQL Question |