Re: Improving the ngettext() patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pg1(at)thetdh(dot)com
Cc: "Sergey Burladyan" <eshkinkot(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Improving the ngettext() patch
Date: 2009-06-04 14:21:28
Message-ID: 13626.1244125288@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

pg(at)thetdh(dot)com writes:
>> Russian plural forms for 100, 101, 102 etc. is different, as for 0, 1, 2.

> True. The rule IIRC is that except for 11-14 and for collective numerals, declination follows the last digit.

Wow. So how does anyone represent that in the .po files? AFAICT the
notation the gettext machinery provides isn't really powerful enough
for this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gevik Babakhani 2009-06-04 14:44:59 Re: Question about FUNCDETAIL_MULTIPLE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-06-04 14:12:21 Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?