Re: [DOCS] Contrib module "xml2" status

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Contrib module "xml2" status
Date: 2013-02-24 20:46:37
Message-ID: 1361738797.819.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 08:25 +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> 2013/2/22 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
> >
> > On 02/21/2013 12:56 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick
> >>> <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not sure if this is a documentation or hackers issue, but the
> >>>> documentation page for contrib module "xml2" refers to PostgreSQL 8.4 in
> >>>> the
> >>>> future tense:
> >>>>
> >>>> "It is planned that this module will be removed in PostgreSQL 8.4 in
> >>>> favor of the newer standard API"
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/xml2.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Are there any plans to remove this module by a forseeable date?
> >>>
> >>> Nope. I have repeatedly been voted down on removing it, and I've also
> >>> been repeatedly voted down on removing the deprecation text. Could we
> >>> at least agree on changing the deprecation text to say "This module is
> >>> deprecated and may be removed in a future release"?
> >>
> >> Not reopening the actual discussion about rmeoving it, but assuming
> >> we're not, strong +1 on changing the deprecation message. And don't
> >> forget to backpatch the change so it shows up in the old versions of
> >> the docs as well.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Yes, we should change it to remove the reference to 8.4.
>
> Documentation patch attached.

done

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-02-24 23:55:00 Re: docs/9.1/static/kernel-resources.html needs updating for NetBSD
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-02-23 05:30:40 Re: Incomplete compatibility information for triggers

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-02-24 21:31:44 Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2013-02-24 20:08:33 Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request)