From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Date: | 2013-02-20 16:26:10 |
Message-ID: | 1361377570.36972.YahooMailNeo@web162901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The way to fix it is to not try to use the sub-production but spell it
> all out:
>
> TRUNCATE TABLE relation_expr_list ...
> | TRUNCATE MATERIALIZED VIEW relation_expr_list ...
> | TRUNCATE relation_expr_list ...
>
> Now the parser doesn't have to make any shift-reduce decision until
> after it can "see past" the first identifier. It's a bit tedious
> but beats making a word more reserved than it has to be.
Thanks! Will do.
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-20 16:58:15 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-20 16:20:41 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-02-20 16:33:41 | Re: Altering Views |
Previous Message | Misa Simic | 2013-02-20 16:25:41 | Altering Views |