| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: beta to release |
| Date: | 2010-05-07 15:31:40 |
| Message-ID: | 13601.1273246300@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am fuzzier on what happens now. I understand that it depends on
> what bug reports we get as a result of beta testing, but what I don't
> quite know is what the expectations are for individual developers, how
> we're tracking what issues still need to be resolved, or what the
> process is for deciding when it's time to release. Any clarification
> from the old hands who have been through this few times before would
> be much appreciated.
It's pretty fuzzy. Usually we don't even think about making a release
decision until a couple of months have elapsed, and at that point we
have a somewhat better handle on what sorts of problems beta has been
turning up. I think trying to set release criteria for 9.0 right now
would be premature.
I would say the expectation for individual developers is "test, and
read code". It's certainly not time to be starting new feature
development yet.
As for tracking, historically Bruce has maintained a list of open
items, but I think we ought to move that over to a wiki page.
The existing PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items page would serve fine.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Crawford | 2010-05-07 17:53:10 | Re: what is good solution for support NULL inside string_to_array function? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-07 15:09:04 | Re: possible memory leak with SRFs |