| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Subodh Kumar <subodh(dot)kumar(at)epps-erp(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: creating table without columns |
| Date: | 2018-10-30 13:12:43 |
| Message-ID: | 13596.1540905163@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Subodh Kumar <subodh(dot)kumar(at)epps-erp(dot)com> writes:
> I have run below query it is created 'test' table without columns
> but table row count is 2.
> please give me clarity about this, i thought it may give syntax error but
> not
> either it must have 2 rows data but both are not happened.
> with ins_test as (select 1 as srno
> union
> select 2)
> select into test from ins_test;
I think you meant to write
with ins_test as (select 1 as srno
union
select 2)
select * into test from ins_test;
or possibly
with ins_test as (select 1 as srno
union
select 2)
select srno into test from ins_test;
What you did write has no columns in the SELECT result clause,
so the INTO creates a table of no columns --- but you get
the expected number of rows.
Postgres allows zero-column tables, and zero-column selects,
because otherwise there are too many weird corner cases;
for instance ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN would have to reject
dropping the last column. The SQL standard has a different
opinion about which way is less ugly ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Subodh Kumar | 2018-10-30 13:15:49 | Re: creating table without columns |
| Previous Message | Axel Rau | 2018-10-30 13:02:33 | Re: Getting fancy errors when accessing information_schema on 10.5 |