Re: .backup files not needed?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: .backup files not needed?
Date: 2008-05-09 14:28:28
Message-ID: 13592.1210343308@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Just had questions from a replication user about why the .backup file is
> described as "can ordinarily be ignored" and is considered optional by
> recovery also even when pg_start_backup() was used.

What it says is that the second part of the filename can ordinarily
be ignored. I don't know why neither he nor you managed to parse the
sentence correctly. Feel free to propose a rewording, but removing
information doesn't sound like a solution.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-09 14:35:24 Re: .backup files not needed?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-05-09 06:51:53 .backup files not needed?