Re: int8 primary keys still not using index without manual

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, "Craig O'Shannessy" <craig(at)ucw(dot)com(dot)au>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: int8 primary keys still not using index without manual
Date: 2003-11-08 19:38:49
Message-ID: 13588.1068320329@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> I like that approach even better than mine. It needs less work during
> the actual planning.

Right. I don't think I will need to touch the planner at all, except
for recording the operator strategy numbers in indexscan plan nodes.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-11-08 20:24:15 Re: Problem in restoring data
Previous Message elein 2003-11-08 19:38:37 Re: Temp rows - is it possible?