| From: | salah jubeh <s_jubeh(at)yahoo(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | SELECT DISTINCT | 
| Date: | 2013-01-17 20:45:32 | 
| Message-ID: | 1358455532.88146.YahooMailNeo@web122202.mail.ne1.yahoo.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
Hello Guys,
During my work, I have seen a common practice of using DISTINCT . Some will argue that developer should know the effect of using it, but keep in mind not all developers are gurus in RDBMs. Normally, developers work in a narrow domain. Using DISTINCT might lead to a huge performance degradation because of sort and filter or hashaggregate operations. I think also the rules in determining if the distinct is requiered or not is moderate in complexity.
Example: Please see how much extra cost we have for 119 record
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT DISTINCT * FROM pg_aggregate;
"HashAggregate  (cost=3.98..5.17 rows=119 width=28) (actual time=0.525..0.743 rows=119 loops=1)"
"  ->  Seq Scan on pg_aggregate  (cost=0.00..2.19 rows=119 width=28) (actual time=0.011..0.195 rows=119 loops=1)"
"Total runtime: 1.008 ms"
I think any query that returns a unique column (primary key, unique) which is not duplicated in some way (join) can use this optimisation technique.
EXAMPLE:
TABLE A (a1 (uinque), a2, ... , an)
SELECT DISTINCT a1, subset of (a2...an) FROM A; -- will return always a distinct result.
When it comes to joins and nested queries , I do not have clear idea how this can be implemented. But I could do some search.
Regards 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kirk Wythers | 2013-01-17 20:58:45 | Re: speeding up a join query that utilizes a view | 
| Previous Message | Paul Jungwirth | 2013-01-17 19:49:37 | Re: Determine if an index is a B-tree, GIST, or something else? |