| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Edson Richter <edsonrichter(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in PgAdmin 1.16.1 |
| Date: | 2013-01-13 18:45:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1358102712.3252.37.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 01:49 -0200, Edson Richter wrote:
> Don't know if pgAdmin maintainer keep an eye in this list, but here I go:
>
> - Using pgAdmin 1.16.1 in Windows 7 x64 downloaded today
>
> 1) You alter a role, adding any information you want: when the
> properties page is open, pgAdmin automatically defines a expiration date
> on 1969/12/31.
>
Yeah, this is a bug we need to fix.
> 2) You want to remove "superuser" option from a role: when you uncheck
> "superuser" box, pgAdmin alerts that removing the superuser from a role
> could cause unexpected behavior, and as you to confirm the action. Once
> you confirm, the "superuser" option is marked again, and nothing else
> happens.
>
This was fixed the 24th of december.
FYI, you should better send this kind of mails to the pgadmin-support
list (http://www.postgresql.org/list/pgadmin-support/)
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vibhor Kumar | 2013-01-13 19:17:34 | Re: pg_upgrade failed for 9.0 to 9.2 |
| Previous Message | AI Rumman | 2013-01-13 18:36:11 | pg_upgrade failed for 9.0 to 9.2 |