Re: [HACKERS] dec alpha/64bit stuff

From: Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart), pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org, scrappy(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (Marc G(dot) Fournier)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] dec alpha/64bit stuff
Date: 1998-03-08 23:03:44
Message-ID: 13571.9039.22441.745637@abraxas.scene.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 7 March 1998, at 18:10:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> OK, I have an idea. Contact Marc, scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot) Have him
> give you a login account to postgresql.org. Use cvs to pull snapshots
> by date. Compile and run initdb on several dates, and by process of
> elimination, find out the day that alpha broke.

That's what I've been thinking of, but I haven't had a chance to get
the cvs archive yet.

>
> We can then analyze the patches for that day and find the problem. I
> assume 6.2.1 worked for you, and that was October 17th. Go from there
> to the 6.3 release and find the date of failure.
>
> With initdb problems, there is really no good way to debug problems like
> this.

I found a decent way. I just put a printf(getpid()), sleep 10 in
BootstrapMain. Then I run initdb in one window and gdb in another,
attaching gdb to that postgres -boot process. Worked fairly well
until I got stumped by the page stuff.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-03-08 23:15:38 Re: [HACKERS] dec alpha/64bit stuff
Previous Message Brett McCormick 1998-03-08 23:01:20 Re: [HACKERS] dec alpha/64bit stuff