Re: Doc patch to note which system catalogs have oids

From: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Doc patch to note which system catalogs have oids
Date: 2012-12-14 15:35:17
Message-ID: 1355499317.28556.2@mofo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/14/2012 02:04:45 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 10:46 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > I am now submitting patches to the commitfest
> > for review. (I'm not sure how I missed this.)
>
> I prefer this version of the patch. I also attached an alternative
> version that may address Tom's concern by noting that the OIDs are
> hidden in the description.

For the record, the preferred version referred to above is:

oid_doc_v4.patch

> Marking "ready for committer".

Thanks!

Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl O. Pinc 2012-12-14 15:52:48 Re: Doc patch, index search_path where it's used to secure functions
Previous Message Mikko Tiihonen 2012-12-14 15:33:05 Re: Use gcc built-in atomic inc/dec in lock.c