Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2014-02-17 16:09:10
Message-ID: 13538.1392653350@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2014-02-17 10:21:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Although on second thought, the lack of complaints from other Windows
>> animals can probably be blamed on the fact that we didn't back-port
>> any of the recent hacking on the Windows build processes. Maybe we
>> should think about doing so, now that the dust seems to have settled.

> Yea, at the very least the gendef.pl thing should be backported,
> possibly the mingw --disable-auto-import thing as well. But it's
> probably a gooid idea to wait till the branches are stamped?

Certainly --- I'm not touching that till the releases are out ;-).
Anything that's broken now has been broken in past releases too,
so it's not worth the risk.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-02-17 16:14:33 Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-02-17 15:58:54 Re: Do you know the reason for increased max latency due to xlog scaling?