Re: Doc patch, put pg_temp into the documentation's index

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doc patch, put pg_temp into the documentation's index
Date: 2012-11-17 06:19:02
Message-ID: 1353133142.6670.13.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:10 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> pg_temp-toindex.patch
> Puts pg_temp into the index of the docs.

But there is no object called pg_temp. It always pg_temp_NNNN
something. How should that be indexed?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-11-17 06:22:29 Re: Doc patch: Document names of automatically created constraints and indexes
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-11-17 06:16:06 Re: Doc patch, put RAISE USING keywords into a table