From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | HK <harikrishnan(at)midascomm(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: accessing primary key slower than accessing non primary key??? |
Date: | 2003-02-13 15:45:37 |
Message-ID: | 13513.1045151137@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice pgsql-odbc |
HK <harikrishnan(at)midascomm(dot)com> writes:
> time in ms per query retrieval
> py key non py key
> ------ -----------
> 2000 15.8 15.7
> 10000 71.2 70.7
> 25000 174 173.5
> 100000 4319 3417
> As u see the non primary key retrieval is faster. AFAIK accessing primary
> key should be faster. Can anybody throw light on why is this anamoly.
There's nothing magic about primary keys in Postgres; I'd expect the
results to come out the same.
The first three of these look like they're indeed the same, to within
measurement error. Not sure about the last one; perhaps you had some
effect of physical order in the table agreeing with the ordering of the
non-primary key?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ren Salomo | 2003-02-13 18:50:50 | Using unixODBC/psqlODBC -- Guidelines/Tips/Manaul? |
Previous Message | HK | 2003-02-13 13:59:25 | accessing primary key slower than accessing non primary key??? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ren Salomo | 2003-02-13 18:50:50 | Using unixODBC/psqlODBC -- Guidelines/Tips/Manaul? |
Previous Message | HK | 2003-02-13 13:59:25 | accessing primary key slower than accessing non primary key??? |