| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: System views for versions reporting |
| Date: | 2024-10-06 16:16:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1350453.1728231407@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> I think it would be nice to include a sha256 hash (or something similar)
> of the libraries as well, so that they can be checked against known good
> values.
That seems well outside the charter of this patch. Also, how would
we even get that information? A typical application doesn't know
exactly what libraries it's linked with or where they came from on
the filesystem. Maybe one could find that out with sufficient
platform-specific hackery, but I don't believe we could do it
portably.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2024-10-06 19:53:32 | Re: Add parallel columns for seq scan and index scan on pg_stat_all_tables and _indexes |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2024-10-06 16:01:29 | Re: System views for versions reporting |