Re: FW: [CYGWIN] 7.2b3 postmaster doesn't start on Win98

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Horák Daniel <horak(at)sit(dot)plzen-city(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: FW: [CYGWIN] 7.2b3 postmaster doesn't start on Win98
Date: 2001-12-03 16:05:23
Message-ID: 13500.1007395523@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Hor=E1k_Daniel?= <horak(at)sit(dot)plzen-city(dot)cz> writes:
>> When trying to start the postmaster on win98se with cygwin
>> I get told that the data directory must be 0700, but when I
>> try to chmod to
>> 700, it apparently succeds, but nothing permissions stay at
>> 755. I suspect
>> this to be because win98 has no real file protection (just a read only
>> attribute)

> It works on WinNT, Win2K, ... because full file security is implemented
> only in this systems. There could be a dirty hack that disables the
> check (for 0700 permissions on $DATADIR) in
> src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c. I don't know if it is possible to
> do it during runtime for only Win9x systems.

Ugh...

Unless someone can think of a reasonable runtime check to distinguish
win98 from newer systems, I think we have little choice but to make the
data directory permissions check be #ifndef __CYGWIN__. I don't like
this much, but (a) I don't want to hold up 7.2 while we look for better
ideas, and (b) no one should consider a Windoze box secure anyway ;-).

Comments?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luis Amigo 2001-12-03 16:06:26 Re: Call for platform testing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-03 15:57:39 Re: Call for platform testing