From: | Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: hardware advice |
Date: | 2012-10-03 11:56:44 |
Message-ID: | 1349265404.30302.YahooMailNeo@web133201.mail.ir2.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
----- Original Message -----
> From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
> To: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2012, 16:14
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] hardware advice
>
> On 10/2/2012 2:20 AM, Glyn Astill wrote:
>> newer R910s recently all of a sudden went dead to the world; no prior
> symptoms
>> showing in our hardware and software monitoring, no errors in the os logs,
>> nothing in the dell drac logs. After a hard reset it's back up as if
>> nothing happened, and it's an issue I'm none the wiser to the
> cause. Not
>> good piece of mind.
> This could be an OS bug rather than a hardware problem.
Yeah actually I'm leaning towards this being a specific bug in the linux kernel. Everything else I said still stands though.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kiriakos Tsourapas | 2012-10-03 13:39:04 | Re: Postgres becoming slow, only full vacuum fixes it |
Previous Message | Andrea Suisani | 2012-10-03 11:45:54 | Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets |