From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [9.1] 2 bugs with extensions |
Date: | 2012-10-03 02:10:29 |
Message-ID: | 1349230126-sup-5891@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of lun oct 01 04:44:28 -0300 2012:
> Hi,
>
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >> Same for 9.2, attached. master needs yet another patch because of the
> >> recent headers reorg, it seems, that's for another day though.
> >
> > No, just remove the RELKIND_UNCATALOGUED case in that switch.
>
> Oh. As in the attached? :)
That seems to work, yes.
While testing this out I noticed that this silently does nothing:
SELECT pg_catalog.pg_extension_config_dump('my_config', NULL);
i.e. the table is not marked as configuration but no error or warning
appears, either. This seems rather surprising.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Phil Sorber | 2012-10-03 03:01:36 | PQping command line tool |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-10-03 01:18:52 | Re: pg_upgrade does not completely honor --new-port |